Relation Annotation
Annotation scheme
We define two types of binary relations that encode static properties between NEs, as a means further enrich the dynamic information that is encoded through event structures. These two relation types are defined in Table 1.
Relation type | Description |
---|---|
Subject_Disorder | Connects Subject phrases and Disorders, when the mentioned disorders correspond to complaints suffered by the subject(s) at the time when pharmacological substances are administered |
![]() |
|
is_equivalent | Allows links to be established between NEs that constitute alternative names for the same concept within the same sentence. Equivalences may correspond to full drug names/disorders and their abbreviations, to generic drug names and their corresponding brand names or synonyms, etc |
![]() ![]() |
Relation annotation statistics
All instances of the relations defined in Table 1 were annotated in all abstracts in the corpus. The total number of annotated relations of each type are shown in Table 2
Relation Type | Total number of annotated relations |
---|---|
Subject_Disorder | 636 |
is_equivalent | 305 |
Agreement
The relation annotations were undertaken by annotators with domain expertise. The quality and consistency of the annotations were verified through the calculation of inter-annotator agreement (IAA) on one quarter of the complete corpus (i.e., 150 abstracts). We calculated IAA in terms of F-Score, as shown in Table 3.
Relation Type | Agreement Rate |
---|---|
Subject_Disorder | 69.3 |
is_equivalent | 80.4 |
TOTAL | 72.6 |